In Brief
Posted:
9:36 AM PDT · May 4, 2026
Image Credits:Marc Piasecki / Getty ImagesTwo days earlier the Elon Musk vs. OpenAI proceedings began past week, Musk texted the exemplary maker’s president and co-founder Greg Brockman. Musk suggested to Brockman that OpenAI settee the suit.
After Brockman replied by suggesting some sides driblet their suits, the speech went disconnected the rails, with Musk responding: “By the extremity of this week, you and Sam volition beryllium the astir hated men successful America. If you insist, truthful it volition be.”
So says a caller filing submitted connected Sunday by OpenAI’s lawyers. The filing didn’t see copies of the substance exchange, and astir of it was dedicated to convincing the justice wherefore this speech connected colony talks should beryllium admitted into evidence. The judge, however, was not having it — ruling the speech inadmissible, per TechCrunch newsman Tim Fernholz, who is connected tract covering the trial.
The implication, however, is clear. Musk’s suit seeks to unwind OpenAI’s for-profit structure, necessitate its tech beryllium made disposable to the public, portion Microsoft’s licensing agreement, and compel OpenAI to wage him general, compensatory, and punitive damages positive his lawyer’s fees. After OpenAI’s lawyers publically shared this “settle-or-else” text, observers instantly clocked that possibly this proceedings isn’t astir Musk’s interest for AI safety, but astir demanding wealth from its occurrence portion kneecapping a rival. This is, essentially, what OpenAI’s countersuit alleges.
Meanwhile, the proceedings continues.
Subscribe for the industry’s biggest tech news














English (US) ·